News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks by jcanyc on Tuesday November 04, 2014 @09:07PM (#8560179)
Re:AWS, this test benchmarked Cloudways managed WordPress on top of AWS. They don't specify instance type, underlying software config, etc. This has little to do with AWS.
Re:WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks by ohashi on Wednesday November 05, 2014 @02:40PM (#8563797)
CloudWays told me they deployed the same stack on AWS/Digital Ocean. I do specify what instance type (m1.small 1.7GB instance) vs 2GB DO droplet.
Re:WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks by dmabram on Tuesday November 04, 2014 @01:48PM (#8558263)
We do a lot of AWS work, so it is interesting to see the poor AWS performance. Any theories as to why it might be?
Re:WordPress Hosting Performance Benchmarks by ohashi on Tuesday November 04, 2014 @01:51PM (#8558287)
I think AWS is best suited for companies really using many of the services in conjunction with one another. If you're just after raw CPU/RAM/IO, I think EC2 is overpriced as an option. Guys like Digital Ocean are offering a lot more bang for your buck (as the testing shows) on that front. Digital Ocean also lacks a ton of the features of AWS, so that's the trade off.