News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Economics of UberX in NYC by jhferris3 on Monday November 03, 2014 @08:59PM (#8554805)
Not taking surge pricing into account probably plays a large role in explaining this article's findings.

Another thing to note in his section with self driving cars: the pool of cars would be fixed in that case, but the amount of uber drivers fluctuates throughout the day. Now, uber doesn't really care if drivers are 70% utilized or 50% utilized, as their revenue doesn't depend on that, but they do have an interest in keeping the drivers marginally satisfied

Also I don't have the numbers but at least in SF, taking an uber to the airport is much cheaper than taking a cab ($25 vs 50 from my office, last I checked), so I could imagine that something like that skews the distribution of ride lengths.

Re:The Economics of UberX in NYC by mattzito on Monday November 03, 2014 @10:12PM (#8554960)
I think the distribution of ride lengths might partially have something to do with the nature of cab hails in NYC vs. other cities. I travel a lot, and in most cities, uber is my go-to cab service, because I don't know the local cab system, I might have to call multiple companies, I can't street hail in a lot of places, etc.

However, in NYC, it's often faster to street hail a yellow cab for short trips than it is to wait for an uber. So here, I mostly use uber for long trips (airports, midtown to the financial district, brooklyn, etc.) or for time-sensitive situations.

Re:The Economics of UberX in NYC by harryh on Tuesday November 04, 2014 @12:18AM (#8555245)
"it turns out that surge pricing amounts to no more than a 12.5% fare premium. Not nothing, but not explanatory either."