Re:Why Dynamic Languages are a Startup's Secret Weapon
by schleyfox on Thursday October 01, 2009 @01:58PM
(#855427)
I entirely agree, OCaml is a particularly fun one for me. I suppose my word choice should have been better, but "dynamic language" was a fairly lazy and easy choice to contrast against big, bad Java.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Dynamic Languages are a Startup's Secret Weapon
by jganetsk on Friday October 02, 2009 @12:54PM
(#857426)
Yes. This is yet another post against static typing, that does not compare against the best languages the static typing world has to offer. Let's compare with a type-inferencing Hindley-Milner-based language.