News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Blockbuster: Losing the plot by exelius on Monday November 03, 2014 @04:35PM (#8553674)
Redbox will be fine, at least for as long as physical media hangs on. It's a different use case - an impulse buy for the less technologically adept. As technology adoption of streaming video solutions reaches saturation though, I can see Redbox fading away.

It won't be a spectacular implosion like Blockbuster because they have the benefit of low capital overhead: those kiosks aren't that expensive and the DVDs themselves are basically free (AFAIK Redbox prints copies of them as-needed in exchange for a share of rental revenue to the copyright owners). So they can keep running them as long as the rental revenue covers the maintenance and re-stocking of the kiosks. The kiosks aren't even using valuable real-estate: if you got rid of a Redbox kiosk, I don't know there's anything else you could really put there that would generate a lot of money.

Re:Blockbuster: Losing the plot by waterlesscloud on Monday November 03, 2014 @04:56PM (#8553813)
I'm not sure where you mean Redbox prints DVDs. They don't do it in the machine, as popular titles can be "sold out". It was over a week before I could find that last Captain America movie at my nearest Redbox.
Re:Blockbuster: Losing the plot by exelius on Tuesday November 04, 2014 @11:18AM (#8557302)
No; they print them at their warehouses on an as-needed basis. DVDs get destroyed and lost easily, and they don't cost much to print. Individual machines will still run out if they're not restocked, though.
Re:Blockbuster: Losing the plot by mkr-hn on Monday November 03, 2014 @08:10PM (#8554663)
If it's true, they probably use a system similar to library ebook loans. They have a certain number of licences that can run out, even though there's no technical reason for it. I don't know why copyright owners would do it with Redbox since they get money for each loan.