Re:A clock that can detect tiny shifts in the flow of time i...
by kbart on Tuesday November 04, 2014 @04:12AM
(#8555678)
Time only defines the state of the extremely complex system known as universe. It's an idea to make things more simple for us humans, not a physics phenomena. Stop all the particles and waves in the universe and time has no meaning. At least that's how I understand what he meant by this.
Re:A clock that can detect tiny shifts in the flow of time i...
by beachwood23 on Monday November 03, 2014 @04:22PM
(#8553608)
I think his point is that time is so inherently relative to the location / inertia of the observer that it is in practice a human construct.
Re:A clock that can detect tiny shifts in the flow of time i...
by physonaught on Monday November 03, 2014 @09:01PM
(#8554809)
The physicists definition of time is "What clocks measure". It sounds like he was just saying the party line.
What is this supposed to mean?
We can measure time with non-human instruments and time is at the core of physics. How can it be a human construct?
Sure, hours, minutes, days, etc. are human constructs based on movements of the earth, but time itself?