Re:Zuckerberg Moves Up The Forbes 400 List. Net Worth Now $2...
by murrayh on Thursday October 01, 2009 @10:16AM
(#854933)
Sorry, I should have explained myself.
The literal interpretation of the challenge is a paradox. The contradiction is that a secret is no longer a secret once revealed (hence my comment).
I don't think that is what you were trying to convey. You do raise a valid point, but without any supporting evidence, it is thoroughly unconvincing. The absence of X is not enough to conclude that X does not exist (especially when X is being purposefully hidden, as in this case).
NOTE: I am not disagreeing with you. I don't know whether or not secret rich people exist.
The literal interpretation of the challenge is a paradox. The contradiction is that a secret is no longer a secret once revealed (hence my comment).
I don't think that is what you were trying to convey. You do raise a valid point, but without any supporting evidence, it is thoroughly unconvincing. The absence of X is not enough to conclude that X does not exist (especially when X is being purposefully hidden, as in this case).
NOTE: I am not disagreeing with you. I don't know whether or not secret rich people exist.