News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Windows Incident – Day 0. Parent comment

Re:The Windows Incident – Day 0 by wfjackson on Sunday November 02, 2014 @06:59AM (#8546372)
OP is mistaken. The signature designation only implies that it's free of pre-installed crapware and junkware. If one wants a real Nexus like device(branded Google), then Surface is their friend(made by MS).

>as such MS certainly has a responsibility for allowing these hardware specs onto the street

And then get sued by the DoJ and split up by a court. Thanks to the antitrust ruling, MS cannot force anything on the OEMs. If you can install Windows on a 512MB RAM machine and sell it, MS can't do shit to stop you.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Windows Incident – Day 0 by mcintyre1994 on Sunday November 02, 2014 @11:19AM (#8546955)
Surely Microsoft can choose which devices they put some signature branding on, and which ones they choose to stock in their own retail stores though? They can't control the hardware running Windows but they absolutely should control be aware of what their 'signature' on an OEM device implies.
[ Parent | on HN ]