Re:Why Email and Cars are heading down the same road
by visakanv on Friday October 31, 2014 @11:28AM
(#8539246)
Yep. Why should the cars be parked? Why should we own cars? All we actually need is a very high % chance of getting access to a car whenever needed. If it were 99.9%, and wayyy cheaper than owning a car, why own the car?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Email and Cars are heading down the same road
by christiansmith on Friday October 31, 2014 @11:49AM
(#8539386)
> Why should we own cars?
In the city, I couldn't possibly agree with this more. When I lived in Boston I sold my car after the first two years because it was a ridiculous expense and hassle for the utility. Taking a cab a few times a week turned out to be cheaper than parking tickets alone.
Given a choice though, I much prefer to live in less densely populated areas (e.g., northwest Montana), and owning a vehicle is really unavoidable. In these places that also means a 4x4 SUV or truck, not a Prius, or else you'd be calling a tow truck every 5 minutes in the winter.
Re:Why Email and Cars are heading down the same road
by jpollock on Friday October 31, 2014 @11:54AM
(#8539423)
In order to control what happens in the car when you're not in it.
I would expect driverless taxis to end up like public toilets.
Re:Why Email and Cars are heading down the same road
by danielbln on Friday October 31, 2014 @11:57AM
(#8539445)
You don't have to register at the toilet with your ID/driver's license. You do however, have to do that when you use e.g car sharing, and the first question the system usually asks you, is: "is the car clean?". If no, then the previous renter will be liable. So this is already a solved problem.