News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Wave and Spam by gojomo on Wednesday September 30, 2009 @03:09PM (#853385)
From my distant view, it appears Wave mostly uses the 'buddy list' model -- you are only messaged by declared friends, or friends-of-friends (referrals via various invite/add-participant operations).

The only opportunity for spam is unwanted invitations to become a friend -- which can be a problem, but is a smaller problem than an open inbox that accepts messages from any principal.

Am I way wrong?

Re:Google Wave and Spam by roc on Wednesday September 30, 2009 @03:36PM (#853455)
That was my understanding as well; that it would effectively work just like GChat (where spam certainly exists, but is a trivial problem).

TFAuthor dismissed that as a non-option, because it would make Wave unsuitable for collecting unsolicited feedback and sales contacts.

But it seems to me that a single Wave account that auto-whitelisted contact attempts would solve that problem at the cost of reintroducing some capacity to spam, but at a vastly reduced level.

Simply applying existing tools and leveraging the other benefits of Wave over SMTP would seem to seriously marginalize spam as a concern.

Re:Google Wave and Spam by ajju on Wednesday September 30, 2009 @04:32PM (#853604)
If you have to accept me as a buddy before I can send you a wave, this will prevent spam but make it harder for wave to replace email. Incidentally, this is also why "solve this turing puzzle before I accept email from you" type of anti-spam solutions are not widely accepted.
Re:Google Wave and Spam by jgrahamc on Thursday October 01, 2009 @05:45AM (#854618)
Agreed. One way to prevent spam within Wave will be to limit its use. That could be done by explicit whitelisting and an out of band communication to get whitelisted (such as using email). Or just by limiting Wave use to people I actually know.

All unsolicited communications could come via email instead of my Wave.