News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Head-On Crash Test of 2009 and 1959 Cars (video) by potatolicious on Wednesday September 30, 2009 @02:08PM (#853213)
This is the sort of attitude that kills people. Years ago I saw on a Seattle news station an "investigative" story about how easy some cars to damage.

As part of their "investigation" they took a bunch of SUVs and backed them into poles (something they claim was easy to do by accident). They then asserted that the big dents in the bumpers were a sign of shoddy engineering and cheap products. Even being a young middle school whipper snapper I knew bullshit when I saw it.

This sort of thing saves your life.

Re:Head-On Crash Test of 2009 and 1959 Cars (video) by 83457 on Wednesday September 30, 2009 @07:14PM (#853946)
Most of those investigations deal with the fact that many 8 and 5 mile an hour bumpers (meaning they shouldn't break under lower impacts) end up shattering at maybe 2mph and cost thousands of dollars to fix -- implying that the manufactuers are engineering them that way on purpose to sell replacement bumpers or that they are no effectively engineering the bumpers to meet the specifications.