News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Practically Accurate Floating-Point Math by conistonwater on Tuesday October 28, 2014 @07:06AM (#8520344)
I don't know about your radiative exchange example, but it is often possible to reparametrize the problem. For example, sometimes you can replace the parameters (x,y) with (s,t)=(x-y, y), which would get you further: x^2-y^2 = s (s+2t), which is stable at s=0, and if x>y>0, then it's stable everywhere. This can shift the region of instability to somewhere far from typical parameter values. Otherwise, yes, this isn't solvable.

There are no comments on this comment yet.