News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:RC fighter model UAV build in Jet engine 360+mph [video] by SandB0x on Sunday October 26, 2014 @05:59AM (#8510679)
I'm more concerned with drunk or texting drivers than getting eaten by a tiger. Does that mean I shouldn't be worried if someone lets a tiger loose in the park?
Re:RC fighter model UAV build in Jet engine 360+mph [video] by lotsofmangos on Sunday October 26, 2014 @08:59AM (#8510914)
That depends. The tiger might get hit by a drunk driver, then eat them when they get out of the car, thus reducing your overall level of personal risk.
Re:RC fighter model UAV build in Jet engine 360+mph [video] by chrisan on Sunday October 26, 2014 @06:44AM (#8510745)
You prove exactly the point. People get all up in arms over silly things when there are much bigger concerns in the world.

Someone shows a video of a RC jet flying extremely fast and the assumption is this guy is endangering the public and has no regard for safety of others.

Lets just get congress to waste time implementing laws for both fast flying RC planes and another one to make it illegal for your tiger to eat a person.

Re:RC fighter model UAV build in Jet engine 360+mph [video] by baddox on Sunday October 26, 2014 @02:47PM (#8511868)
What if there's a tiger with a team of professional large animal trainers abiding by all sensible guidelines?
Re:RC fighter model UAV build in Jet engine 360+mph [video] by demarq on Sunday October 26, 2014 @04:05PM (#8512161)
except for letting loose the tiger in the first place.
Re:RC fighter model UAV build in Jet engine 360+mph [video] by baddox on Sunday October 26, 2014 @04:19PM (#8512220)
The hypothetical situation I'm proposing is if the tiger is not let loose, but is being tended to by experienced people.
Re:RC fighter model UAV build in Jet engine 360+mph [video] by lotsofmangos on Sunday October 26, 2014 @04:47PM (#8512344)
We should also calculate the risk if the tiger was being flown round the park on a jet powered drone, just to cover all bases.