Re:Capital vs. labor: who risks more?
by akgerber on Saturday October 25, 2014 @01:30PM
(#8508774)
Why is it the case that there 'no reason to tax savings'? Tools rust, food rots, houses fall down. One can't save useful things indefinitely without cost.
Why, then, is it inherently true that a government (or other entity) should provide citizens a mechanism to store the means to buy those things indefinitely for free?
Why, then, is it inherently true that a government (or other entity) should provide citizens a mechanism to store the means to buy those things indefinitely for free?