Re:In Oakland, a Sign of Some Very High Times
by dllthomas on Tuesday October 21, 2014 @01:40AM
(#8486082)
Most of those people aren't starting to rent a place now. Someone I know moved to SF about 7 years ago. If he were to move, rent for something comparable is more than 2x what he's paying.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:In Oakland, a Sign of Some Very High Times
by eru on Tuesday October 21, 2014 @01:54AM
(#8486117)
Why don't their landlords do anything about this shortfall?
[dead]
Re:In Oakland, a Sign of Some Very High Times
by dllthomas on Tuesday October 21, 2014 @10:18AM
(#8487433)
I don't understand what you're objecting to. Rent control is indeed the reason the person I was discussing has only had their rent rise with CPI.
Re:In Oakland, a Sign of Some Very High Times
by klipt on Tuesday October 21, 2014 @02:10AM
(#8486154)
San Francisco has excellent (for long term tenants) rent control.
Re:In Oakland, a Sign of Some Very High Times
by eru on Tuesday October 21, 2014 @07:11PM
(#8490699)
Thanks for the information!
I guess that leads to `excellent' non-upgrading of houses that have long term tenants in them.
Re:In Oakland, a Sign of Some Very High Times
by dllthomas on Tuesday October 21, 2014 @10:23PM
(#8491246)
I think "strong rent control" is the uncontroversial phrasing.
Re:In Oakland, a Sign of Some Very High Times
by klipt on Saturday October 25, 2014 @03:00PM
(#8509013)
If the owner refuses to do maintenance, you can stop paying rent altogether until they do it.
Yes. But they won't upgrade anything.