Except, of course, if you're limiting the TV anyways, and you don't allow kids to have (smart-)phones.
In general, I agree, there are other kinds of punishment, but they might sometimes not be effective. Then what?
And if you try beating your child and it doesn't work, what then?
Physical violence is used by bad perents who don't know effective methods of discipline.
Did you read the article? Research shows that corporal punishment can be effective, if done in the right way (i.e. don'y hit your kids when they are angry).
> Physical violence is used by bad perents who don't know effective methods of discipline.
We disagree with the definition of bad parent, apparently. I think my parents were very good. Of course, as I said initially, they very rarely resorted to physical punishment, but me and my brother knew that the threat was credible. Of course, I don't think any of their friends would agree with them, but then, none of them had comparably active and difficult children.
Second, violence is not acceptable as punishment, but it is acceptable (often necessary) in defense of self and others. If people are fighting, it's fine to break them up. That said, I doubt a larger adult needs to resort to blows to stop two kids fighting.
Third, there are plenty of punishments that don't involve hitting. It's common to restrict access to TV or games. If all else fails, there's the dreaded, "No phone for a week."