The big thing is that most FOSS fundraisers adopt the same perks used by proprietary software. These are typically vanity rewards or early-access. Early access is straight up anti-social when it comes to FOSS. Giving people the ability to steer the project makes a lot more sense.
Of course no one has software for that, so I had to make my own.
Successful fundraiser: http://igg.me/at/rtlsdr
Backend: https://github.com/keenerd/featuritis
Old-ish progress report: http://kmkeen.com/igg-report/
What is the ideal ratio of exit nodes to users? It seems that too close to 1:1 is going to be almost as bad as too few nodes, at least to my (not particularly well versed in Tor infrastructure) thinking.
[0] - http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2014/05/openss...
If not. Someone should build one.
Here's the link:
In fact, there is a page for the Tor community, so if you want to support them, go there and give them some money ;)
If it's not permitted on Kickstarter, we would probably do better to convince them to allow it, with certain restrictions of course. A purpose-built site simply wouldn't have the traffic to produce that kind of funding for smaller projects.
Maybe we, as the FOSS community, need to start utilizing crowd sourcing more. Maybe we can use the marketing from Heartbleed etc. to launch a Kickstarter to audit OpenSSL, and use the NSA revelations to launch a Kickstarter to run more exit nodes (which are depereately needed -- about 1k nodes for 2M users). The project to audit Truecrypt seemed to reap the benefits of this quite effectively.
I'm not familiar with the TOS for Kickstarter so maybe this isn't possible, but clearly the general public clearly has more interest than we (I) thought. They just don't know how to channel their support effectively.