No, thanks. I'll pass.

If you have any evidence, present it now.

Your post is a classic example of shifting the burden of proof. You are the one with the belief that contradicts documents, leakers, whistleblowers, journalistic reporting, senatorial reports, US history, partner documents, and on.

Or if you need more direct links look through the other branches of this thread. Plenty of evidence, much of it directly from the Congressional oversight committee itself.

The nonsense comes from trying to reinterpret a small number of slides and to then broaden that interpretation to a expansive umbrella.

It is simply truly the case that the NSA and partnered agencies have broad access to sweeping untargetted collection of data.

Shifting the burden of proof? You're the one claiming something illegal is going on without any evidence. I might as well call you a rapist and ask you to prove you aren't.