News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Losing 58.3 Lbs for Science by mga226 on Monday October 13, 2014 @06:06PM (#8450939)
"Carbs" in this context is referring to foods that have a high carbohydrate content, like potatoes, yams, bread, pasta, and to a lesser extent things like carrots, beets, parsnips etc. Foods to avoid if trying to keep carbohydrate intake below 20-50, as these diets typically require.

It doesn't refer to cruciferous/fibrous veggies, as well as things summer squash, even though they are almost entire carbs, because the carb content per serving in these foods is quite low - low enough that you can probably eat as much of them as you like and still be within the prescribed range.

Re:Losing 58.3 Lbs for Science by sjtrny on Monday October 13, 2014 @06:42PM (#8451077)
I know it's only intended to refer to a particular subset of foods. It's just a personal pet peeve that people have this mindset and use this language and forget that the things that aren't "carbs" contain carbohydrates. It displays an ignorance on the topic.
Re:Losing 58.3 Lbs for Science by zt on Monday October 13, 2014 @06:55PM (#8451115)
Ya, well, when you're trying to eat fewer than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day, one becomes quite familiar with how many grams there are in broccoli. Sorry that my vagueness offended.
Re:Losing 58.3 Lbs for Science by mga226 on Tuesday October 14, 2014 @10:08AM (#8453465)
Congratulations, by the way, on your great results!
Re:Losing 58.3 Lbs for Science by mga226 on Tuesday October 14, 2014 @10:06AM (#8453457)
Not to belabour the point, but I disagree. People who "have this mindset" probably appreciate this distinction better than most. It's just a domain-specific shorthand use of the word "carb."