Re:“Complete Acquiesence”: How the Pontiac Aztek Happened
by leoc on Monday October 13, 2014 @04:00PM
(#8450295)
Is the appearance really all that bad either? I don't love it, but I've seen plenty of slightly awkward-looking cars and I'm not sure what's supposed to make this one so particularly bad. Maybe the photo in the article is from an unusually flattering angle?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:“Complete Acquiesence”: How the Pontiac Aztek Happened
by jessaustin on Monday October 13, 2014 @04:18PM
(#8450401)
In both of the pics in TFA, the camera is on the ground, so we're looking up at the vehicle. That's kind of an old trick for making any mostly-horizontal object look better. The truly awful angle from which to view an Aztek [really, has no one complained about the spelling of this name?] is from the back.
Re:“Complete Acquiesence”: How the Pontiac Aztek Happened
by stickfigure on Monday October 13, 2014 @04:14PM
(#8450376)
They actually look worse in person. The first time I saw one of these on the road, my jaw dropped - I just couldn't believe that something this unlovable made it into production. I distinctly remember thinking "GM has gone seriously off the rails". And this is coming from someone that owns a KTM 990A and a Honda Element!
Re:“Complete Acquiesence”: How the Pontiac Aztek Happened
by publicfig on Monday October 13, 2014 @04:14PM
(#8450375)
It is quite a bit different than the aesthetics of vehicles that were out at the time. It fits a lot better with current aesthetics with the rise of the crossover than it did a decade ago.
Re:“Complete Acquiesence”: How the Pontiac Aztek Happened
by ScottBurson on Monday October 13, 2014 @04:15PM
(#8450389)
It was ugly, but not ugly enough to be cute. See: Volkswagen Thing[0]
Re:“Complete Acquiesence”: How the Pontiac Aztek Happened
by leoc on Monday October 13, 2014 @04:53PM
(#8450603)
Interesting: it looks like a more successful rival to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mini_Moke Mini Moke.