Time-Lock Encryption (2011)

Re:Time-Lock Encryption (2011) by hawkice on Sunday October 12, 2014 @10:57PM (#8447330)

So, I'm not entirely sure what the point is of the (2011) tags is, but my understanding is these are consistently and regularly updated and changed, made sure to be up to date. How much of a regularly maintained scholarly work needs to change before the year changes?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time-Lock Encryption (2011) by sigmar on Monday October 13, 2014 @12:50AM (#8447531)

Well, for one, the first sentence references a file that has since been decrypted (IIRC). so it is useful for the reader to understand at what point in the timeline of events this piece was initially written, even if the technical aspects are consistently updated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time-Lock Encryption (2011) by cradle on Monday October 13, 2014 @05:50AM (#8448088)

Wiki (not the greatest source I'll admit) says none of the three insurance files have been cracked

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Time-Lock Encryption (2011) by TeMPOraL on Monday October 13, 2014 @01:18AM (#8447587)

Maybe (2011, 2014) then, or something similar?

[ Parent | on HN ]