Re:Judge Rejects Defense That FBI Illegally Hacked Silk Road...
by zo1 on Saturday October 11, 2014 @05:28AM
(#8441694)
"At this point it's just a server that the FBI found something on they're planning on using in the trial."
Yes, a server they potentially broke into and violated someone's privacy over. Why does it have to be more complicated than that?
In fact, someone at the FBI should be charged with some sort of illegal-seizure crime, or violation of privacy crime. Whatever it's called these days by the lawyer-priesthood.
Yes, a server they potentially broke into and violated someone's privacy over. Why does it have to be more complicated than that?
In fact, someone at the FBI should be charged with some sort of illegal-seizure crime, or violation of privacy crime. Whatever it's called these days by the lawyer-priesthood.