News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Judge Rejects Defense That FBI Illegally Hacked Silk Road... by pdabbadabba on Friday October 10, 2014 @10:15PM (#8441006)
Half right. Trial court judges make rulings of law, juried make findings of fact. An appellate court can then correct the trial court's legal errors, if necessary. But you're right that trial courts' legal rulings aren't precedential.
Re:Judge Rejects Defense That FBI Illegally Hacked Silk Road... by rosser on Friday October 10, 2014 @11:04PM (#8441092)
Yeah, "finding of fact" is a more apt phrasing than "ruling of fact". I thought of that after posting my comment, but felt it was a probably bit fine a distinction for the point I was making. Thanks for the clarification.