Re:Judge Rejects Defense That FBI Illegally Hacked Silk Road...
by bediger4000 on Friday October 10, 2014 @08:20PM
(#8440726)
A great opinion. I heartily endorse that opinion.
But the FBI, and US DoJ, operate under some interpretation of the verbiage in the US Constitution. That interpretation has come to mean less and less protection against searches and seizures over the years, as the US Supreme Court interprets what the (to me) plain and simple language of the 4th amendment says.
But the FBI, and US DoJ, operate under some interpretation of the verbiage in the US Constitution. That interpretation has come to mean less and less protection against searches and seizures over the years, as the US Supreme Court interprets what the (to me) plain and simple language of the 4th amendment says.