News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Is ZFS a suitable replacement for other Linux filesystems?. Parent comment

Re:Is ZFS a suitable replacement for other Linux filesystems? by beagle3 on Friday October 10, 2014 @11:10AM (#8438106)
How much memory does ZFS (and/or ZoL) need per 1TB of storage when dedup is off?

Also, bup ("it backs things up!") efficiently dedups across an ssh connection (using bloom filters) Scales are differrent, but it might work for ZFS as well.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is ZFS a suitable replacement for other Linux filesystems? by ryao on Friday October 10, 2014 @12:02PM (#8438430)
I answered this question here:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8437921

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is ZFS a suitable replacement for other Linux filesystems? by tehmaco on Friday October 10, 2014 @11:39AM (#8438277)
The recommendations I've read say you need 1GB RAM for system use (assuming a dedicated file server), and then as much RAM (ideally ECC RAM) as you want to give it for caching data.

If you're short on RAM (sub 4GB), you might need to change some of the default settings to avoid problems, but RAM's fairly cheap nowadays, so unless you've got an old machine, it's not likely to be a problem :)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Is ZFS a suitable replacement for other Linux filesystems? by DuskStar on Friday October 10, 2014 @06:58PM (#8440480)
I'd point out that cheap ram is about $10/GB right now, and a cheap HDD is $30/TB. So if you need an extra GB of ram for each TB of storage, you're increasing storage costs by a third.
[ Parent | on HN ]