News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by tomp on Friday October 10, 2014 @05:17AM (#8436871)
While driving, humans assume that the road ahead is OK (at least without significant potholes, and in sunny hot weather no ice-patches). We would expect better of robots (i.e. if a human crashes because of an oil patch, (s)he's a bad driver; if a computer crashes, it's a million-dollar lawsuit).

Edit: a better solution would be to observe the behaviour of other drivers; if there is someone driving ahead of you, you can assume that the road between you and them is OK; if there's noone ahead of you, you need to drive slower and be more careful (that's how I drive at night). Once there's a critical mass of cars with cameras, cars could communicate road conditions automatically.

Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by agateau on Friday October 10, 2014 @06:49AM (#8437107)
> Once there's a critical mass of cars with cameras, cars could communicate road conditions automatically.

I would be frightened to trust the data coming from a random car in front of me. Inferring road condition from another car behavior sounds reasonable, using data supplied from it, not so much.

Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by danielweber on Friday October 10, 2014 @10:24AM (#8437828)
You shouldn't and wouldn't rely unfailingly on what other cars merely report. If the car in front of you insists its maintaining speed while your own readings indicate its slamming on its brakes, you should assume it's slamming on its brakes.

However, if the car three cars in front of you just broadcast "I'm doing an emergency stop right now", that's really valuable data. The human in your car won't know anything is wrong for at least a second. The human driver behind you would know about it before the human driver in front of you.

Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by ryan-c on Friday October 10, 2014 @12:59PM (#8438804)
> However, if the car three cars in front of you just broadcast "I'm doing an emergency stop right now", that's really valuable data.

Until some asshat implements a button that sends this message for "lulz", though that would probably constitute a crime under existing law.

Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by danielweber on Friday October 10, 2014 @01:12PM (#8438893)
That will be the most common failure mode for computer-driven cars: how easy they are to bring to a stop. (And, yes, that's probably criminal behavior.)

A computer-driven car, though, wouldn't (shouldn't) just immediately slam on the brakes because of that signal. It would tighten seat belts and start slowing down, but it also would want to avoid getting rammed by the car behind it. It can make very accurate estimates about its stopping distance and use all of it.

Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by __P on Friday October 10, 2014 @07:08AM (#8437145)
The internet works that way, and you seem to be fine with that. :\ Is it the "saftey issue"? i.e the internet can't crash you into a wall, it can only send you to rotton or steal your credit card...
Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by sp332 on Friday October 10, 2014 @10:21AM (#8437811)
Wow, no. I don't trust the internet to give me real facts about elephants, let alone anything life-threatening. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiality_and_Other_T... If the equipment had some built-in tamper detection, and Google's sensors digitally signed data if they didn't detect tampering, then I might trust it enough to drive with.
Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by etimberg on Friday October 10, 2014 @08:15AM (#8437304)
Re:Tesla: Introducing Autopilot and Dual Motor All Wheel Drive by babo on Friday October 10, 2014 @07:13AM (#8437156)
So if a car, driving right ahead of me, leaking oil when cornering...