Re:Pulse: open, trustworthy, decentralised sync and cloud se...
by dochtman on Friday October 10, 2014 @05:06AM
(#8436845)
I'm a bit worried that, as far as I see, the Syncthing protocol doesn't really allow having servers/peers that don't see plain-text. (Since I think it mostly just uses TLS to keep things secret from eavesdroppers.) I've always been looking for an open source Dropbox-like that allows having storage that only sees ciphertext (despite the fact that it would require a little key management from the user, which I think is a usability challenge, but one that can be overcome).
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pulse: open, trustworthy, decentralised sync and cloud se...
by rich90usa on Friday October 10, 2014 @12:17PM
(#8438543)
BitTorrent Sync has functionality for generating "encrypted secrets" using the developer API. It is possible to deliver a secret key to a peer which only allows for that peer to access encrypted versions of the folder content.
Re:Pulse: open, trustworthy, decentralised sync and cloud se...
by balu_ on Friday October 10, 2014 @05:16AM
(#8436866)
did you take a look at sparkleshare,
it's kind of a dropboxreplacement based on git.
Last time i checkt it was possible to enable ciphertext storage ( https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/wiki/Client-Side-Encry... ) .
Re:Pulse: open, trustworthy, decentralised sync and cloud se...
by abritishguy on Friday October 10, 2014 @11:00AM
(#8438043)
Look at boxcryptor (works with dropbox)