Re:Sartre on the Nobel Prize (1964)
by spectrum on Friday October 10, 2014 @03:10AM
(#8436596)
Richard Feynman on the Nobel prize when the interviewer asks him if his research was worth the Nobel prize that he won: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZF4vBreqmE
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Sartre on the Nobel Prize (1964)
by mironathetin on Friday October 10, 2014 @04:41AM
(#8436792)
Feynman is splendid, like always. For my understanding, his reasoning is much clearer and less artificially complex than Sartres.
Thanks for posting this.
Re:Sartre on the Nobel Prize (1964)
by stephancoral on Friday October 10, 2014 @11:36AM
(#8438255)
Sarte's reasoning is pretty simple: he doesn't want to become a component of an institution. He wants to be able to write as Jean-Paul Sartre, not Jean-Paul Sartre the Nobel Prize winner.
That thinking is flawed though. A prize doesn't define you by accepting it. When I am given a birthday cake, I don't then become "heuving, the receiver of birthday cakes".
The only reason that really makes sense to decline a prize is if you are heavily opposed to what the institution represents. However, he didn't strike me as anti-intellectual.