Re:Yahoo Hacked
by kens on Monday October 06, 2014 @05:46PM
(#8418492)
Since you asked for a downvote explanation: I couldn't make any sense of the comment, even after thinking about it. It's not that I disagree, I can't even figure out the analogy. Are you saying B shouldn't be charged with anything because they didn't murder, or B should be charged with trespassing but not murder, or B should be charged with felony murder because of the trespass, or something else?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
The parent asked whether the OP should be treated differently from people actually doing the malicious act. My analogy was meant to illustrate that we should.
I didn't express a stance either way on whether he should be prosecuted for a more minor offense or not, in the analogy's case trespassing. (There are obviously both pros and cons in the precedent set by prosecuting people for revealing their own minor crime on account of reporting a terrible one.)