Re:It's not exponential, it's sigmoidal
by sethjohn on Tuesday November 27, 2007 @01:06PM
(#83972)
I believe this article is referencing the the metaphor and the hyperbole of "Exponential Growth!!!"...not a mathematical treatment of growth rates.
That growth eventually slows is a very very simple point, but it's important to never forget. Maybe everybody is making this too complicated because Saul Griffith is supposed to be a 'genius' now?
That growth eventually slows is a very very simple point, but it's important to never forget. Maybe everybody is making this too complicated because Saul Griffith is supposed to be a 'genius' now?