News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Universal SSL by peterwwillis on Monday September 29, 2014 @04:19PM (#8385017)
Correct. If you want to keep the data private, any authentication system would be better than none. It would be nice to encrypt the data too, and provide non-repudiation, which is what a secure connection is for.

Most CDN setups i've seen have never bothered with any of this because they pass no private data; it's all static resources, mostly. Even if they did pass private data, they just use IP filtering and completely ignore mitm. Then they don't address client authentication because IP spoofing is, like, totally hard.

There are no comments on this comment yet.