News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Our Invisible Rich by drinkzima on Monday September 29, 2014 @02:18PM (#8384262)
Do mean besides the hoards of research linking larger income inequality to lower growth: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/06/upshot/alarm-on-income-ine... http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/00142921950...

Not to mention the marginal value of dollars to the hyper rich is substantially lower.

The wealth/income distribution we have now looks very different than it did even 10 years ago, so it is worth discussing as a society what the 'correct' distribution should be. Hedge fund managers now are no better than the managers of 10-20 years ago, the system has evolved to favor them more.

We can argue about whether they 'deserve' said wealth, but research shows that the wealthy need a given dollars less than the impoverished and growth can benefit when the distribution is more equal as well.

Re:Our Invisible Rich by jiggy2011 on Monday September 29, 2014 @02:43PM (#8384425)
"Hedge fund managers now are no better than the managers of 10-20 years ago, the system has evolved to favor them more."

Don't hedge funds now have better technology and bots etc that boost the productivity of each trader?

Re:Our Invisible Rich by elastine on Monday September 29, 2014 @02:55PM (#8384522)
Yes, but at the same time there are many more hedge funds canceling out the relative advantage of each trader.
Re:Our Invisible Rich by jiggy2011 on Monday September 29, 2014 @03:03PM (#8384580)
Yes, but that makes the market as a whole more effective.
Re:Our Invisible Rich by Ma8ee on Monday September 29, 2014 @09:12PM (#8386266)
In what sense "more efficient"? There is nothing that says that just because some people have become better at making money the market as a whole is working better.