Re:Technical analysis of client identification mechanisms
by opendais on Friday September 26, 2014 @08:19PM
(#8375573)
Well, I think it honestly harkens back to Google's original "Don't be evil" motto. I think most of the people at Google want to "Do the right thing" as long as they keep their jobs.
They want to find the right balance, the problem is I think a large portion of Google has lost their way in that regard due to the need to make Google more money. If the volume isn't growing fast enough, they have to find newer...higher margin...options to grow.
Re:Technical analysis of client identification mechanisms
by esMazer on Friday September 26, 2014 @09:10PM
(#8375689)
After reading the post I don't think "they had lost their way" instead they are trying to find ways to help everyone involved.
Re:Technical analysis of client identification mechanisms
by magicalist on Saturday September 27, 2014 @01:21AM
(#8376160)
Have you actually looked at how Google Analytics tracks users?
It's very straight forward, nothing like almost anything on this list.
Re:Technical analysis of client identification mechanisms
by spacefight on Saturday September 27, 2014 @03:56AM
(#8376392)
Like cookies? Like shared cookies if you opt-in?
Re:Technical analysis of client identification mechanisms
by intortus on Friday September 26, 2014 @09:53PM
(#8375777)
I would imagine this has value not just to analytics. Deanonymization has a lot of value in curbing abuse. Privacy is of paramount value, though, so it's hard to reconcile. To me it's a dilemma.
Then again it kind of makes sense. Who better knows?