News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Code Archeology – Lines of code by age by coffeemug on Friday September 26, 2014 @05:52PM (#8375114)
> Remember - the lighter the color, the older the code.

I really think it should be the opposite. Recent code should be clearly visible and older code should progressively interpolate into black. The current setup is extremely unintuitive for me.

Re:Code Archeology – Lines of code by age by ephemeralgomi on Saturday September 27, 2014 @01:11AM (#8376142)
Luckily you're a programmer, and can easily change a python script!
Re:Code Archeology – Lines of code by age by samuirai on Friday September 26, 2014 @06:22PM (#8375213)
That it's so interesting. A lot of people said that to me. But to me it felt more natural to highlight old code. Probably because I had this bias in the back of my mind that old code could be bad code.
Re:Code Archeology – Lines of code by age by pjmorris on Friday September 26, 2014 @06:49PM (#8375303)
In my experience, it's often the new/changed code that is the most interesting. It's often the code that is causing some unexpected bug. 'No one sews a patch of unshrunk cloth on an old garment. Otherwise, the new patch pulls away from the old cloth, and a worse tear is made'
Re:Code Archeology – Lines of code by age by marcosdumay on Friday September 26, 2014 @10:13PM (#8375822)
You are ignoring survivor bias.

Old code is mostly good code. It's new code that has varying quality.

Re:Code Archeology – Lines of code by age by hello_there on Friday September 26, 2014 @07:27PM (#8375421)
Physical things often become darker with age due to dirt or corrosion. Examples are wood and metal, or an old vs. a new wall painted in the same color. They all become darker over time. Therefore I think it't more intuitive to think of darker things as older.