News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by derekp7 on Thursday September 25, 2014 @09:30PM (#8370845)
Logically, it can also have the opposite effect. If you have all the rights for a product, you have no incentive to improve it, until the patents are about to expire.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by CamperBob2 on Thursday September 25, 2014 @11:02PM (#8371117)
My favorite example is the Roomba. Cool new vacuum cleaner invented, ridiculously broad/abstract patents filed... result, near zero progress for 20 years.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by rhino369 on Thursday September 25, 2014 @11:45PM (#8371235)
Patents don't give you rights to a product. Only a certain implementation of one.

Your competitors will patent improved versions if you don't. They might also invent a product using a new implementation leaving you with no market.

And in practice, it doesn't work that way. Companies acquire patents on each minor upgrade to their technology.

Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by vidarh on Friday September 26, 2014 @04:41AM (#8371873)
Your competitors won't exist if your basic patents are broad enough to deny them access to the market.
Re:The Great Lightbulb Conspiracy by derekp7 on Friday September 26, 2014 @08:53PM (#8375647)
I was thinking more along the lines of competitors who are in the same space as you (let's say, light bulb manufactures) -- you patent a new type of bulb, your competitors could patent a bunch of improvements on it to deny you future market on improved versions.