Re:Linus says Linux has become 'bloated and huge'
by scythe on Tuesday September 22, 2009 @06:27AM
(#836655)
&totse users ran tests of zfs-fuse back in the day and found that it was actually noticeably slower than native ext3. From that, I'm inclined to argue the opposite: filesystems should almost definitely be in-kernel. Granted, their tests were on Linux, not on a modern microkernel.
Re:Linus says Linux has become 'bloated and huge'
by skwiddor on Tuesday September 22, 2009 @08:15AM
(#836765)
Linux, fuse
there's your problem. it's not designed for it
Re:Linus says Linux has become 'bloated and huge'
by agazso on Tuesday September 22, 2009 @05:52PM
(#838053)
Well, with the last sentence I tried to write:
Unfortunately userspace file systems like NTFS-3G are lot slower than their native counterparts.
Which is understandable, regarding kernel calls are still quite expensive.
Re:Linus says Linux has become 'bloated and huge'
by skwiddor on Tuesday September 22, 2009 @06:28AM
(#836659)
I wouldn't use Fuse as your benchmark. All of plan9's filesystems are userspace (except the one that uses a dedicated machine). They can saturate 10gbe so your objections really concern Fuse and it's hosts.
Unfortunately native disk file systems like NTFS-3G is lot more slower than their native counterparts.