Re:Indoor mapping with Estimote Beacons
by jimiasty on Wednesday September 24, 2014 @05:32PM
(#8364260)
You are right that people and their bodies might absorb Bluetooth radiowaves, but our solution does combine several different techniques to minimize that effect.
This is the first version of our SDK and we encourage developers in our community to test different setup with more beacons or beacons located a bit higher, so there is always a line-of-sight between phone and beacons.
Re:Indoor mapping with Estimote Beacons
by linkeex on Wednesday September 24, 2014 @05:36PM
(#8364278)
> [...] but our solution does combine several different techniques to minimize that effect.
Can you elaborate on this techniques? What is it exactly that you're using?
Re:Indoor mapping with Estimote Beacons
by stevedc3 on Wednesday September 24, 2014 @05:42PM
(#8364313)
We have a team of data engineers in data science and PhD's measuring all the signals we receive from the beacons and performing algorithms (e.g. trilateration, least squared etc) and combining this with positioning signals we can process based on positioning of the device. The trick is to account for different devices, different antenna placement on models etc. So over time we build a database that improves accuracy based on usage. Regarding people being present, we can account for that if we predict that signals are reflecting differently based on estimated density. These are super challenging problems so we have a team dedicated to it, and iterate quickly.
As my academic advisor always said: Every human is an 80kg water bag thats disturbing the signal.
Did you test this with multiple persons in the room and if so, what was your result concerning accuracy.