Re:CVE-2014-6273: Buffer overflow vulnerability vulnerabilit...
by AceJohnny2 on Tuesday September 23, 2014 @02:22PM
(#8357098)
I was going to say: "but if you get MITMed, the attacker can replace the Release.gpg as well", but clearly I didn't understand GPG signage: an attacker won't have Debian's private keys and so won't be able to produce valid signatures.
Spelling out my derp in case someone else had the same thought.
Spelling out my derp in case someone else had the same thought.