Re:Pauseless GC for OpenJDK [video]
by kleiba on Monday September 22, 2014 @03:31AM
(#8349610)
It seems that the title of this submission does not actually reflect its content very well.
Title of submission: "Pauseless GC for OpenJDK"
Within the first minute of the presentation: "Shanendoah is not pauseless" (0:45, emphasis mine).
The presenter then continues, "It could be pauseless. We have plans to make it pauseless, but for now the first step is just doing concurrent evacuation."
Perhaps a more apropriate submission headline would be "Potentially pauseless GC for OpenJDK" or something along those lines?
Title of submission: "Pauseless GC for OpenJDK"
Within the first minute of the presentation: "Shanendoah is not pauseless" (0:45, emphasis mine).
The presenter then continues, "It could be pauseless. We have plans to make it pauseless, but for now the first step is just doing concurrent evacuation."
Perhaps a more apropriate submission headline would be "Potentially pauseless GC for OpenJDK" or something along those lines?