Re:FBI and Secret Service Files: Aaron Swartz
by gnaritas on Saturday September 20, 2014 @11:57AM
(#8344784)
Why would they? Privacy means nothing to the non-existent.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI and Secret Service Files: Aaron Swartz
by srasp413 on Saturday September 20, 2014 @12:27PM
(#8344865)
It could mean something to their families, though. That may not be enough for it to be law, but I'm sure a lot of families would prefer that if something troubling came up after their loved one died, no one else would have to find out.
Re:FBI and Secret Service Files: Aaron Swartz
by ajkjk on Saturday September 20, 2014 @12:05PM
(#8344801)
That's your opinion and doesn't answer the question at all.
At least for health records, you do have privacy after you die, apparently for 50 years: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/understanding/covereden...
Re:FBI and Secret Service Files: Aaron Swartz
by gnaritas on Tuesday September 23, 2014 @01:06PM
(#8356439)
I didn't state an opinion, I asked a question and then I stated a fact, an indisputable one that is not opinion, perhaps you should read it again.
Re:FBI and Secret Service Files: Aaron Swartz
by saalweachter on Saturday September 20, 2014 @12:04PM
(#8344797)
If it pleases living people to think that they will have a right to privacy after they die, or to force other people to not pry into their dead relatives secrets, living people could easily craft a right to privacy for the deceased.