Re:Patent troll gives up, can’t defend “matchmaking” patent ...
by dragonwriter on Friday September 19, 2014 @06:52PM
(#8342911)
> edit: dragonwriter nailed it with "unfair preference"... "fraudulent conveyance" must be something else.
Well, "fraudulent conveyance" would seem to be the right tort if it is a tort; "unfair preference" would be a possible grounds for disgorgement even if the elements of fraudulent conveyance weren't met. Either would seem possible in the scenario described.
Well, "fraudulent conveyance" would seem to be the right tort if it is a tort; "unfair preference" would be a possible grounds for disgorgement even if the elements of fraudulent conveyance weren't met. Either would seem possible in the scenario described.