Re:Microsoft OCR Library for Windows Runtime
by MrBuddyCasino on Friday September 19, 2014 @05:34AM
(#8339661)
Thats the big question. Tesseract is pretty good, though quite slow I must say.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft OCR Library for Windows Runtime
by Norm-- on Friday September 19, 2014 @02:28PM
(#8341764)
It depends on what is being scanned. Say you have a perfectly formatted image, directly taken from a scanner, it's a pretty darn quick process.
But from my experience, what adds to the slowness is pre-processing the image to make it suitable for OCR, especially tesseract. I still haven't found the magic combination of filters because every image is different, especially if your source them from users camera phones.