News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The value of Twitter by dca on Sunday September 20, 2009 @11:44PM (#833959)
What's up with the disclaimer?

"stuckk.net is a blog by Andrew Wansley and Joe Huston. We are contractually required to post 750 words a week."

Anyone ever see that on a blog before?

Re:The value of Twitter by dagw on Monday September 21, 2009 @02:37AM (#834108)
My initial reaction upon seeing that is that it sounds like an up front apology. Something along the lines of "Look I know that last post was unfocused drivel, but we had to get something, anything up by midnight or be in breach of contract".

(disclaimer I have not read the blog so I know nothing of its actual quality)

Re:The value of Twitter by jakarta on Monday September 21, 2009 @12:13AM (#833984)
Maybe they did it as a way to make sure they both contributed to the blog in a regular fashion?
Re:The value of Twitter by treyp on Monday September 21, 2009 @03:18AM (#834142)
maybe it's sarcasm?
Re:The value of Twitter by tomjen2 on Monday September 21, 2009 @01:15AM (#834046)
It is properly the best guarantee that they will post regularly a new user can expect.

And I would love to hear the story behind it.