News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple – Privacy – Government Information Requests by rlpb on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:00AM (#8334448)
> is far beyond the scope of anything that a US court can order a private party to do.

They could order Apple to disclose signing keys so that the government can install spyware themselves. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavabit#Suspension_and_gag_orde... for a case where they have done something similar before.

Re:Apple – Privacy – Government Information Requests by abritishguy on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:29AM (#8334509)
>the government can install spyware themselves

It would have to be an OS update since applications don't have access to that stuff, even if signed with an apple key.

Re:Apple – Privacy – Government Information Requests by rsynnott on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:38AM (#8334541)
That's probably not quite true. Take an app that the user is already likely to have given access to their photos, like Facebook. Create a malicious app with the same app identifiers, sign, and push to the user. At that point, the phone thinks it's Facebook, and should allow access.

That said, it'd be kind of unsubtle, and they'd probably get caught.

Re:Apple – Privacy – Government Information Requests by abritishguy on Thursday September 18, 2014 @06:45AM (#8334556)
Ahh yes, I assumed we were talking about messages.
Re:Apple – Privacy – Government Information Requests by mrsteveman1 on Thursday September 18, 2014 @02:14PM (#8336725)
I assumed it was primarily the review process ensuring that the proper sandbox configuration was included in the bundle and applied to apps at runtime, checking for private API use automatically etc, and that Apple could probably ignore their own restrictions if they chose to, especially those private APIs.

iOS won't let even the most permissively configured, "unreviewed" app do things that apps aren't supposed to be able to do?