Re:Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings
by jiggy2011 on Tuesday September 16, 2014 @09:22PM
(#8327999)
Although assuming it was true that intelligence was mostly based on genetics rather than quality of education (I don't have a strong view one way or the other) then we could use that knowledge to improve wealth inequality by filtering people into school systems with very different curriculum where they would learn the best way to add value with their ability level.
Re:Genetics and intelligence differences: five special findings
by seanflyon on Tuesday September 16, 2014 @09:50PM
(#8328079)
> assuming it was true that intelligence was mostly based on genetics rather than quality of education
I think the difference between these 2 opinions is their definition of intelligence.
All to often, people start using it as justification for income disparity, wealth disparity, minority crime rates and sometimes differences in economic development between different countries. Racism and classism aren't too far behind.
I'm reminded that it is no more noble to fool a person out of his money by outwitting him, than it is to bully him out of his money with superior strength. Being smarter isn't necessarily a moral justification for greater rewards.
Similarly, we rely on the economic system using prices as an information signalling mechanism; more valuable labour is priced up, and thus supply should follow. But if the valued labour is intelligent labour, and its supply is not easily increased, then there is less of a moral case for paying its suppliers more, for that attribute alone.