Re:Upgrading GitHub to Rails 3 with Zero Downtime
by tootie on Monday September 15, 2014 @11:38PM
(#8322912)
I feel like the lesson here is not to put mission-critical systems on leading edge software. I'd be porting to Java at this point. GitHub is a big boy company.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Upgrading GitHub to Rails 3 with Zero Downtime
by wging on Tuesday September 16, 2014 @12:05AM
(#8322966)
In 2014, Rails is not leading-edge software.
Re:Upgrading GitHub to Rails 3 with Zero Downtime
by imjoshholloway on Tuesday September 16, 2014 @04:45AM
(#8323586)
It's `web scale` and everything
Re:Upgrading GitHub to Rails 3 with Zero Downtime
by tootie on Tuesday September 16, 2014 @09:16AM
(#8324298)
It was when they started.
Re:Upgrading GitHub to Rails 3 with Zero Downtime
by Tenhundfeld on Tuesday September 16, 2014 @12:05PM
(#8325188)
Leading edge is subjective. Rails was already 3-4 years old and already being shipped standard on OSX when GitHub was launched. IMO, that's not excessively leading edge for a small startup, especially if the founders already know the framework.