"At one point Thursday afternoon, 26 U2 titles charted simultaneously on iTunes top 200 albums rankings, Apple and Interscope Records representatives confirmed to Mashable on Friday. Meanwhile, U218 Singles landed in the top 10 in 46 countries."
http://mashable.com/2014/09/12/u2-album-itunes-chart-apple-r...
(some of those dollars may be the same ones over and over again)
It's easy in hindsight to cast aspersions, but to me it seemed prima facie an 'invasion' of a private space. Like, Apple decided that owning a U2 album was now mandatory.
I'm reminded of that Page quote last year where he dismissed any Google Glass privacy concerns.
I don't have a good articulation for this yet, but it seems an awful lot of people are blind to the alienation these systems are capable of causing.
I am sure it wasn't the intended purpose... but there's a lot of pub on this... and it certainly doesn't seem to be affecting sales.
And it's a bad idea to seem uncool right before you launch a very expensive line of fashion accessories. All it took was one photo of showering Scoble to forever make Google glasses radioactive.
Then the word spread that the album had been given away for free. But U2 and Apple had gone to great pains to explain that Apple "bought" the album for its users as a gift.
I feel sorry for the support people who had to field calls about this stuff this week. What a half-baked marketing stunt.