News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The Python Paradox is now the Scala Paradox. Parent comment

Re:The Python Paradox is now the Scala Paradox by masklinn on Saturday September 19, 2009 @08:30AM (#831902)
> Esoteric languages are a lot of fun.

No esoteric language was mentioned in TFA.

> But they're not very productive

Esoteric languages aren't "not very productive", they're the most counter-productive langages on the planet. Productivity runs counter to the point of an esoteric language.

> Messing around with unstable languages is a lot of fun. It's educational too. But don't build your business around it. Python/Django and Ruby/Rails are only barely stable enough to work with. Thinking that using Haskell, Clean, IO or Lisp will be a net benefit to productivity is foolish.

Wow. Cocaine is one hell of a drug.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Python Paradox is now the Scala Paradox by almost on Saturday September 19, 2009 @09:07AM (#831930)
Now I don't agree with his points exactly either. But you and I know full well what he meant when he said "Esoteric Languages". Arguing with people by intentionally misinterpreting their statements just makes you look stupid and it lowers the tone of the whole discussion.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Python Paradox is now the Scala Paradox by masklinn on Saturday September 19, 2009 @10:00AM (#831966)
> Arguing with people by intentionally misinterpreting their statements just makes you look stupid and it lowers the tone of the whole discussion.

Yes, because purposefully using terms which don't apply to the subject just to insult other people or degrade languages you don't like clearly doesn't.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Python Paradox is now the Scala Paradox by gizmo on Saturday September 19, 2009 @12:25PM (#832097)
I never thought the word esoteric would raise any eyebrows. I have no idea how it can be interpreted as an insult. It's meant as the opposite of mainstream; languages you won't find at IBM. I hope you don't work there, otherwise you might feel insulted again!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Python Paradox is now the Scala Paradox by masklinn on Saturday September 19, 2009 @01:34PM (#832160)
> I have no idea how it can be interpreted as an insult.

http://esolangs.org/wiki/Esoteric_programming_language

> It's meant as the opposite of mainstream; languages you won't find at IBM.

Then what you're looking for is "non-mainstream". Or maybe "suit-incompatible". And FWIW IBM has a lot of Python stuff in their developerworks site and newsletter. And given Erlang comes from Ericsson, not exactly a small company, it's hardly "suit-incompatible".

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The Python Paradox is now the Scala Paradox by gizmo on Saturday September 19, 2009 @03:36PM (#832259)
Ah, I see. That definition doesn't fit the situation though. I was using the dictionary definition, and the original article used the word esoteric in the same context as I did.
[ Parent | on HN ]