News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A de-centralised network, with chosen usernames. Is it possible?

I was wondering if it would be possible to have a de-centralised network, which still allowed each person to choose a username.

As an example, imagine a de-centralised Twitter, where you go to register through a client, and if the username isn't taken, it gives you the username. If it is taken, it doesn't allow you to take it.

If they owned the account with that username, they would then be able to login to their account from a new client, on a new device.

I'm wondering if this is possible? A few years ago, I'd have assumed not, but now with de-centralised systems growing popular, such as with Bitcoin, I'm wondering if it is?

( 4 comments | 2 points | on HN )
Re:A de-centralised network, with chosen usernames. Is it po... by shellab on Sunday September 14, 2014 @11:39AM (#8315409)
Email is a de-centralized system where you choose your username. It's just that the fully qualified username includes the domain where it was created.
Re:A de-centralised network, with chosen usernames. Is it po... by AndrewHart on Sunday September 14, 2014 @04:46PM (#8316189)
Right, so imagine that, but without the domain part.
Re:A de-centralised network, with chosen usernames. Is it po... by steanne on Sunday September 14, 2014 @01:24PM (#8315678)
https://www.respectnetwork.com/

doesn't have much traction yet.

Re:A de-centralised network, with chosen usernames. Is it po... by _pius on Sunday September 14, 2014 @12:11PM (#8315474)
DNS