Re:Uber sued for allegedly refusing rides to the blind
by totony on Wednesday September 10, 2014 @11:36PM
(#8300742)
Imo there is a difference, as the motive for not allowing the person is different. Morality is majorly about motives.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber sued for allegedly refusing rides to the blind
by ASneakyFox on Thursday September 11, 2014 @04:55AM
(#8301546)
I agree there's a difference. As the objection is not to the person. But being that the person needs a dog to go anywhere in public the two are very intertwined.
Also itd serve as loophole to discriminate since many blind people have service dogs.