News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Brad, let's get together by jgalvez on Thursday September 17, 2009 @11:33PM (#829593)
I wish I could downvote this. It's amazing how people still give attention to Dave Winer. Haven't we gone through this before?
Re:Brad, let's get together by mcantelon on Thursday September 17, 2009 @10:13PM (#829496)
This reminds me of Winer's past griping about the world not adopting his version of RSS (http://backend.userland.com/davesRss2PoliticalFaq). If your standard is open and superior, hackers will use it. If they don't, spend your time innovating on The Next Big Problem instead of insisting that everyone else doesn't get it.
Re:Brad, let's get together by blasdel on Thursday September 17, 2009 @10:41PM (#829538)
The only feed consumers that do not support Atom are controlled by (and solely used by) Dave Winer.
Re:Brad, let's get together by calambrac on Thursday September 17, 2009 @09:47PM (#829450)
Brad Fitzpatrick needs to prove he cares about the web?

To Dave Winer?

This is ridiculous.

Re:Brad, let's get together by seldo on Thursday September 17, 2009 @09:15PM (#829400)
Never trust a man who thinks every paragraph of his blog is worthy of an individual permalink.
Re:Brad, let's get together by bootload on Thursday September 17, 2009 @09:49PM (#829453)
"... every paragraph of his blog is worthy of an individual permalink ..."

No but think of it this way. Each idea can be linked. The fine grained linking is possible because Dave uses an outliner for ideas ~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outliner

Dave's obsessed with them ~ http://www.outliners.com/

Re:Brad, let's get together by stilist on Thursday September 17, 2009 @11:29PM (#829587)
Re:Brad, let's get together by teej on Thursday September 17, 2009 @09:21PM (#829406)
It seems like it's a feature of the blogging engine he uses. All his posts are marked up as such. It is easier to make specific references that way.
Re:Brad, let's get together by adamhowell on Thursday September 17, 2009 @11:36PM (#829597)
Obligatory Dive Into Mark reference goes here:

http://diveintomark.org/archives/2004/05/30/pink-numbers